Highway Code is the official guide to inform all
drivers of their legal obligations and best practice for day-to-day driving.
The use of MUST NOT within the Code signifies that this is a legal
requirement and drivers can be prosecuted for ignoring it.
The standard penalty for ignoring a red X symbol is a £100 fixed penalty
notice.
The new updates have been made to reflect changes to the Traffic Signs
Regulations and General Directions (2016) legislation, which sets out the
appearance and purpose of the country’s road signs.
The changes have been made to inform drivers about how they should
respond to the red X symbol, which appears on central reservation signs
and smart motorway, overhead gantries to inform them of lane
closures.
“Red flashing lights. If red lights
flash on a signal and a red “X” is showing, you MUST NOT drive in the lane
shown as closed beyond the signal. This applies until you pass another signal
indicating that the lane is no longer closed, by displaying the word “End” or a
speed limit sign and you are sure that it is safe to proceed.
“Red flashing lights. If red lights
flash on a signal in the central reservation or on the side of the road and
lane closed sign is showing, you MUST NOT go beyond the signal in any lane.”
******************
The red X signs are used on around 300 miles of smart motorway where
there is no hard shoulder or the hard shoulder has been converted into an extra
lane for traffic.
They can be activated remotely to shut a lane affected by a breakdown or
accident but there are fears many drivers are ignoring them and having to
swerve at the last minute to avoid obstructions.
Until recently, police had to catch you in the act to be able to issue
an FPN but since June 10, forces have been able to use footage from gantry
cameras to identify offenders and automatically issue then with fines.
Controversy
Smart motorways have caused controversy since they were introduced.
On some the hard shoulder has been turned into an extra regular lane
either at peak times or permanently. Supporters say this helps add road
capacity and ease congestion with relatively little cost.
Matt Pates, who manages the East Midlands division of Highways England,
recently argued that hard shoulders were no longer necessary as modern cars were
far more reliable than older vehicles.
He also claimed motorways are “as safe, if not safer” without hard
shoulders as they are “inhospitable” places for drivers, most of whom now get
advanced warning if their car is developing a fault.
Critics, however, argue that removing the Emergency Lane would leaves
drivers without somewhere safe to stop should their car develop a sudden fault
and puts recovery crews at greater risk. They also argue that not having a
clear hard shoulder makes it harder for emergency vehicles to get through
traffic when called to an incident.